Basic, we analyzed habits on the Top-2 predictors address sex, informant sex, and their correspondence (this product out-of mainly based address sex and you may created informant sex), however, without any community-top predictors, permitting arbitrary outcomes at all about three levels. This is to evaluate if or not target sex, informant sex, in addition to their communication had high effects with the result varying, and you will whether or not these types of consequences varied ranging from countries. These analyses had been work with separately to own N, E, O, A beneficial, and you can C to the SDS for their 6 factors due to the fact outcome adjustable, and for the mix of the 30 NEO PI-Roentgen part bills toward SDS for all 31 facets given that the outcomes adjustable.

Repaired negative effects of address and you may informant sex

The results for the Level-2 fixed effects are reported in Dining table 2 . Unsurprisingly, the coefficients ?₀₀₀ were all significant, implying significant variation in facet scores between persons. These coefficients indicate the average squared deviation of the individual observations from their culture-, sex-, and facet-specific means, that is, the averaged facet variances within the culture and gender groups.

Table 2

The coefficients ?₀₁₀, indicating effects of target sex, were significant and negative for E, O, A, and C, as well as for all 30 facets combined, indicating more variance in descriptions of male than of female targets. In contrast, the coefficient for N was positive but not significant, suggesting similar variances in N for women and for men.

The coefficients ?₀₂₀ that indicate effects of the sex of the informant were significant and positive in all analyses, implying that personality descriptions by female informants varied more than those by male informants. Finally, the coefficient ?₀₃₀ reflecting systematic Target Sex ? Informant Sex interactions, was significant for the facets of N only. (suite…)